We use provider pages as the source of truth.
Pricing, plan names, free plan availability, and trial details are checked against official provider pages before being used in ProPicked scores. Vendor relationships do not change rankings, scores, or recommendations.
Provider pricing facts
Provider pricing facts: Relevance AI offers a free plan. Free-trial availability is checked against public provider data when available. We currently track 4 plans for this pricing page.
Source and freshness note
Source and freshness note: pricing, free-plan, trial, and plan-limit signals are checked against public provider pages and updated comparison data. Last checked May 2026.
Relevance AI Pricing Plans (2026)
Complete pricing breakdown, plan comparison and value analysis
Key Takeaways
- ✓Relevance AI offers a free plan — no credit card required. 0
- ✓4 pricing plans available.
- ✓Value for money score: 7.6/10 — good value for the features offered.
Relevance AI Plans Comparison
Free
- 100 credits/day
- 1 user seat
- 10MB knowledge storage
- Basic agent building
- Community support
Team
- 100,000 credits/month
- 10 user seats
- 1GB knowledge storage
- Premium integrations
- Priority support
Business
- 300,000 credits/month
- Unlimited users
- 5GB knowledge storage
- Multi-agent systems
- Advanced analytics
Enterprise
- Custom credits
- Custom storage
- SSO and RBAC
- Data residency
- Dedicated support
Plan Feature Comparison
| Feature | Free Free | Team $199/mo | Business $599/mo | Enterprise Free |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 credits/day | ✓ | — | — | — |
| 1 user seat | ✓ | — | — | — |
| 10MB knowledge storage | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Basic agent building | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Community support | ✓ | — | — | — |
| 100,000 credits/month | — | ✓ | — | — |
| 10 user seats | — | ✓ | — | — |
| 1GB knowledge storage | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Premium integrations | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Priority support | — | ✓ | — | — |
| 300,000 credits/month | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Unlimited users | — | — | ✓ | — |
| 5GB knowledge storage | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Multi-agent systems | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Advanced analytics | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Custom credits | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom storage | — | — | — | ✓ |
| SSO and RBAC | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Data residency | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Dedicated support | — | — | — | ✓ |
Relevance AI Pricing Summary
How Does Relevance AI Pricing Compare?
Market Positioning
Starting at $199/mo, Relevance AI is positioned as a premium solution in the AI Tools space. This reflects its enterprise-grade feature set and is best suited for teams who need advanced capabilities.
Price-to-Feature Ratio
Relevance AI's 7.6/10 value score puts it on par with market averages. You're getting fair value, though some competitors may offer more aggressive pricing.
Upgrade Path
Relevance AI offers 4 distinct tiers, giving you room to scale as your needs evolve. Starting from the free plan, you can gradually upgrade without switching platforms — a significant advantage over competitors with limited plan options.
Related Articles
All articles →Best AI Writing Tools 2026: ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs Jasper vs Copy.ai vs Writesonic
The frontier models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) at $20 quietly destroyed Jasper and Copy.ai's $39 tier on raw output quality. Brand voice training is the only moat left. Here's where each one still wins.
Best AI Coding Assistants 2026: Cursor vs Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot vs Codeium vs Aider
We ran the same Next.js refactor through Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codeium and Aider. The $20/mo tier matters less than you think — the agent quality gap is what burns hours.
AI Image Generation 2026: Midjourney v7 vs DALL-E 3 vs Flux Pro vs Stable Diffusion 3.5
The 2026 AI image era is defined by four models: Midjourney v7, DALL-E 3, Flux Pro and Stable Diffusion 3.5. We ran 30 prompts across six categories and benchmarked cost-per-1000-image so you can pick the right tool without burning a month of credits.
Relevance AI Pricing FAQ
Ready to try Relevance AI?
Start with Relevance AI's free plan and upgrade when you're ready.
We may earn a commission through links on this page · Editorial policy