We use provider pages as the source of truth.
Pricing, plan names, free plan availability, and trial details are checked against official provider pages before being used in ProPicked scores. Vendor relationships do not change rankings, scores, or recommendations.
Provider Pricing Facts
Provider pricing facts: Miro offers a free plan; Fellow offers a free plan.
Source and Freshness Note
Source and freshness note: pricing, free-plan, and feature signals are compared from public provider data and updated comparison records. Last checked May 2026.
Miro vs Fellow: Honest Comparison (2026)
Miro
The visual workspace for innovation and team collaboration
Fellow
AI-powered meeting management platform for productive teams
We may earn a commission through links on this page · Editorial policy
Quick Verdict:
Miro wins with 8.7/10 vs 8.2/10. Choose Miro for more features. Choose Fellow for ease of use.
Miro wins this comparison with a score of 8.7/10 vs 8.2/10. Both offer free plans. Miro stands out for clear category fit:Miro is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives., while Fellow excels at clear category fit:Fellow is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.. This is confirmed by our feature analysis where Miro also scores higher (8.9/10).
| Feature | Miro | Fellow |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 8.7/10 | 8.2/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8.5/10 | 8.7/10 |
| Features | 8.8/10 | 7.9/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 |
| Customer Support | 8.0/10 | 8.2/10 |
| Free Plan | Yes ✓ | Yes ✓ |
| Starting Price | $8/mo | $7/mo |
| Feature Score | 8.9/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Top Strength | Clear category fit:Miro is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives. | Clear category fit:Fellow is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives. |
| Biggest Weakness | Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing. | Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing. |
| Best For | Is Miro free?Provider data indicates a free plan is available. | Is Fellow free?Provider data indicates a free plan is available. |
| Winner | Miro (8.7/10) | |
What is Miro?
The visual workspace for innovation and team collaborationMiro is a Business tool for teams evaluating collaboration software in 2026. The visual workspace for innovation and team collaboration ProPicked's review is based on provider-published pricing, plan limits, feature availability, and customer review signals rather than sponsorship placement. Provider data highlights whiteboard, diagramming, real Time Collaboration, templates, sticky Notes as tracked capabilities. The current rating is 8.7/10, with value, feature coverage, ease of use, and support considered separately so buyers can compare it against alternatives in the same category. Use this page to verify what Miro offers, where it is strongest, what trade-offs to check, and which competing tools may fit better before committing.
- +Clear category fit:Miro is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- +Provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. Published entry pricing starts around $8/month.
- +Feature coverage is documented:Provider data highlights whiteboard, diagramming, real Time Collaboration, templates, sticky Notes as tracked capabilities.
- •Is Miro free?Provider data indicates a free plan is available.
- •What should I verify before buying?Confirm current pricing, plan limits, cancellation terms, integrations, and support response expectations.
- •How does ProPicked score Miro?Ratings combine provider data, pricing checks, feature coverage, and public review signals across four dimensions.
What is Fellow?
AI-powered meeting management platform for productive teamsFellow is a Business tool for teams evaluating collaboration software in 2026. AI-powered meeting management platform for productive teams ProPicked's review is based on provider-published pricing, plan limits, feature availability, and customer review signals rather than sponsorship placement. Provider data highlights real Time Collaboration, templates, video Integration, commenting, integrations as tracked capabilities. The current rating is 8.2/10, with value, feature coverage, ease of use, and support considered separately so buyers can compare it against alternatives in the same category. Use this page to verify what Fellow offers, where it is strongest, what trade-offs to check, and which competing tools may fit better before committing.
- +Clear category fit:Fellow is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- +Provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. A 14-day trial is listed for evaluation before purchase.
- +Feature coverage is documented:Provider data highlights real Time Collaboration, templates, video Integration, commenting, integrations as tracked capabilities.
- •Is Fellow free?Provider data indicates a free plan is available.
- •What should I verify before buying?Confirm current pricing, plan limits, cancellation terms, integrations, and support response expectations.
- •How does ProPicked score Fellow?Ratings combine provider data, pricing checks, feature coverage, and public review signals across four dimensions.
Miro vs Fellow: Key Differences
Miro vs Fellow: Quick Verdict
Miro comes out ahead (8.7 vs 8.2/10), but the gap isn't huge. The tiebreaker? Which tool's strengths match your specific needs.
Choose Miro if:
- Incredible versatility — works for brainstorming, wireframing, planning, and workshops equally well
- Real-time collaboration with cursors, voting, and timer features enhances remote meetings
- Massive template library with 300+ options for virtually every business process
- You want the higher-rated option overall (8.7/10 vs 8.2/10)
- You're watching your budget — Miro gets a 8.3/10 for value
Choose Fellow if:
- AI summaries and transcription save post-meeting time
- Collaborative agendas keep meetings focused
- Action items integrate with project management tools
- You match the profile: managers running regular 1-on-1 meetings
- Ease of use matters to you — Fellow scores 8.7/10 here
Decision Summary
Who wins in each scenario? A quick look at how Miro and Fellow compare across different buyer needs.
Scores 8.7/10 vs 8.2/10
Scores 8.3/10 on value vs 8.2/10
Ease of use: 8.7/10 vs 8.5/10
Features + support avg: 8.4/10 vs 8.1/10
Free plan available + 8.3/10 value
Both offer free plans
Choose Miro if you need...
- ✓Clear category fit:Miro is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- ✓Provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. Published entry pricing starts around $8/month.
- ✓Feature coverage is documented:Provider data highlights whiteboard, diagramming, real Time Collaboration, templates, sticky Notes as tracked capabilities.
- !Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing.
- !Fit depends on workflow:Teams with complex integrations or strict compliance requirements should compare Miro against at least two alternatives.
Choose Fellow if you need...
- ✓Clear category fit:Fellow is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- ✓Provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. A 14-day trial is listed for evaluation before purchase.
- ✓Feature coverage is documented:Provider data highlights real Time Collaboration, templates, video Integration, commenting, integrations as tracked capabilities.
- ✓Lower starting price ($7/mo vs $8/mo)
- !Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing.
- !Fit depends on workflow:Teams with complex integrations or strict compliance requirements should compare Fellow against at least two alternatives.
Our Take: Miro vs Fellow
Miro edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.2/10. The gap is noticeable but not dramatic — both are legitimate options depending on what you prioritize.
Where they differ: Miro's biggest strengths are clear category fit:Miro is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives. and provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. Published entry pricing starts around $8/month.. Fellow, on the other hand, shines with clear category fit:Fellow is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives. and provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. A 14-day trial is listed for evaluation before purchase.. These reflect fundamentally different product priorities.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each one with zero risk before committing. We recommend trying both for a week with real data.
Miro vs Fellow Score Comparison
| Category | Miro | Fellow |
|---|---|---|
🏆Overall Score | 8.7▲ | 8.2 |
💫Ease of Use | 8.5 | ▲8.7 |
⚙Features | 8.8▲ | 7.9 |
💰Value for Money | 8.3▲ | 8.2 |
💬Customer Support | 8.0 | ▲8.2 |
Why These Scores? Our Reasoning
- +Clear category fit:Miro is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- +Provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. Published entry pricing starts around $8/month.
- +Feature coverage is documented:Provider data highlights whiteboard, diagramming, real Time Collaboration, templates, sticky Notes as tracked capabilities.
- -Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing.
- -Fit depends on workflow:Teams with complex integrations or strict compliance requirements should compare Miro against at least two alternatives.
- +Clear category fit:Fellow is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- +Provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. A 14-day trial is listed for evaluation before purchase.
- +Feature coverage is documented:Provider data highlights real Time Collaboration, templates, video Integration, commenting, integrations as tracked capabilities.
- -Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing.
- -Fit depends on workflow:Teams with complex integrations or strict compliance requirements should compare Fellow against at least two alternatives.
Miro vs Fellow Pros & Cons
+Strengths
- ✓Clear category fit:Miro is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- ✓Provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. Published entry pricing starts around $8/month.
- ✓Feature coverage is documented:Provider data highlights whiteboard, diagramming, real Time Collaboration, templates, sticky Notes as tracked capabilities.
-Weaknesses
- ✗Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing.
- ✗Fit depends on workflow:Teams with complex integrations or strict compliance requirements should compare Miro against at least two alternatives.
- ✗Review signals can lag product changes:New feature launches and pricing updates may not be reflected in public user feedback immediately.
+Strengths
- ✓Clear category fit:Fellow is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- ✓Provider-checked pricing context:Provider data indicates a free plan is available. A 14-day trial is listed for evaluation before purchase.
- ✓Feature coverage is documented:Provider data highlights real Time Collaboration, templates, video Integration, commenting, integrations as tracked capabilities.
-Weaknesses
- ✗Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing.
- ✗Fit depends on workflow:Teams with complex integrations or strict compliance requirements should compare Fellow against at least two alternatives.
- ✗Review signals can lag product changes:New feature launches and pricing updates may not be reflected in public user feedback immediately.
Who Should Use Miro vs Fellow?
Miro is ideal for
- •Is Miro free?Provider data indicates a free plan is available.
- •What should I verify before buying?Confirm current pricing, plan limits, cancellation terms, integrations, and support response expectations.
- •How does ProPicked score Miro?Ratings combine provider data, pricing checks, feature coverage, and public review signals across four dimensions.
- •Match the provider's published plan limits against your expected seats, projects, contacts, storage, or usage volume.
- •Check whether the features you need are included in the entry plan or require an upgrade.
Fellow is ideal for
- •Is Fellow free?Provider data indicates a free plan is available.
- •What should I verify before buying?Confirm current pricing, plan limits, cancellation terms, integrations, and support response expectations.
- •How does ProPicked score Fellow?Ratings combine provider data, pricing checks, feature coverage, and public review signals across four dimensions.
- •Match the provider's published plan limits against your expected seats, projects, contacts, storage, or usage volume.
- •Check whether the features you need are included in the entry plan or require an upgrade.
When NOT to Choose Miro or Fellow
Knowing when a tool is the wrong fit is just as important as knowing its strengths
Skip Miro if...
- ✗Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing.
- ✗Fit depends on workflow:Teams with complex integrations or strict compliance requirements should compare Miro against at least two alternatives.
- ✗Review signals can lag product changes:New feature launches and pricing updates may not be reflected in public user feedback immediately.
Skip Fellow if...
- ✗Plan limits still need buyer verification:Always confirm usage caps, seat limits, and renewal pricing on the official provider site before purchasing.
- ✗Fit depends on workflow:Teams with complex integrations or strict compliance requirements should compare Fellow against at least two alternatives.
- ✗Review signals can lag product changes:New feature launches and pricing updates may not be reflected in public user feedback immediately.
Miro vs Fellow Decision Framework
Choose based on what matters most to you
Miro vs Fellow Pricing
| Pricing Feature | Miro | Fellow |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Starting Price | $8/mo | $7/mo |
| Free Trial | Not available | 14 days |
| Number of Plans | 4 | 4 |
| Value Rating | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 |
Miro Plans
- ✓3 editable boards
- ✓Core integrations
- ✓Anonymous visitors
- ✓Unlimited boards
- ✓Custom templates
- ✓1 day version history
- ✓Smart diagramming
- ✓SSO
- ✓Advanced integrations
- ✓Data governance
- ✓Managed domains
- ✓Premium support
Fellow Plans
- ✓Up to 5 meeting notes monthly
- ✓AI meeting summaries
- ✓Action items tracking
- ✓Calendar integration
- ✓Unlimited meeting notes
- ✓AI-powered insights
- ✓Custom templates
- ✓Integrations with 50+ tools
- ✓Everything in Pro
- ✓Team analytics
- ✓Admin controls
- ✓Priority support
- +1 more
- ✓Everything in Business
- ✓SSO and SCIM
- ✓Custom data retention
- ✓Dedicated support
- +1 more
What You Get: Plan Feature Comparison
Comparing Miro's Starter ($8/mo) vs Fellow's Pro ($7/mo)
| Feature | Miro | Fellow |
|---|---|---|
| Unlimited boards | ✓ | ✗ |
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1 day version history | ✓ | ✗ |
| Unlimited meeting notes | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI-powered insights | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations with 50+ tools | ✗ | ✓ |
Which Should You Choose?
Quick Buyer's Guide
Based on our analysis, here's who each tool is best suited for
- ✓Is Miro free?Provider data indicates a free plan is available.
- ✓What should I verify before buying?Confirm current pricing, plan limits, cancellation terms, integrations, and support response expectations.
- ✓Users who need clear category fit:Miro is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- ✓Is Fellow free?Provider data indicates a free plan is available.
- ✓What should I verify before buying?Confirm current pricing, plan limits, cancellation terms, integrations, and support response expectations.
- ✓Users who need clear category fit:Fellow is positioned for buyers comparing collaboration options, making it easier to benchmark against direct alternatives.
- ✓Teams with tighter budgets ($7/mo vs $8/mo)
Miro vs Fellow: The Bottom Line
For most teams, Miro is the safer bet — but Fellow has its own strengths.
## Our Verdict Miro comes out ahead (8.7 vs 8.2/10), but the gap isn't huge. The tiebreaker? Which tool's strengths match your specific needs. ### Choose Miro if: - Incredible versatility — works for brainstorming, wireframing, planning, and workshops equally well - Real-time collaboration with cursors, voting, and timer features enhances remote meetings - Massive template library with 300+ options for virtually every business process - You want the higher-rated option overall (8.7/10 vs 8.2/10) - You're watching your budget — Miro gets a 8.3/10 for value ### Choose Fellow if: - AI summaries and transcription save post-meeting time - Collaborative agendas keep meetings focused - Action items integrate with project management tools - You match the profile: managers running regular 1-on-1 meetings - Ease of use matters to you — Fellow scores 8.7/10 here Fellow at 8.2/10 is still competitive and may be the better fit depending on your specific requirements and budget.