We use provider pages as the source of truth.
Pricing, plan names, free plan availability, and trial details are checked against official provider pages before being used in ProPicked scores. Vendor relationships do not change rankings, scores, or recommendations.
Provider Pricing Facts
Provider pricing facts: Appwrite offers a free plan; Convex offers a free plan.
Source and Freshness Note
Source and freshness note: pricing, free-plan, and feature signals are compared from public provider data and updated comparison records. Last checked May 2026.
Appwrite vs Convex: Honest Comparison (2026)
Appwrite
Open-source backend platform for web, mobile, and Flutter developers
Convex
Reactive backend platform with real-time database, serverless functions, and automatic caching
We may earn a commission through links on this page · Editorial policy
Quick Verdict:
Convex wins with 8.6/10 vs 8.2/10. Choose Appwrite for overall value. Choose Convex for ease of use.
Convex wins this comparison with a score of 8.6/10 vs 8.2/10. Both offer free plans. Appwrite stands out for open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure, while Convex excels at automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity. However, Appwrite leads in our detailed feature analysis (7.1 vs 5.8).
| Feature | Appwrite | Convex |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8.5/10 | 8.8/10 |
| Features | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.8/10 | 8.2/10 |
| Customer Support | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Free Plan | Yes ✓ | Yes ✓ |
| Starting Price | $15/mo | $25/mo |
| Feature Score | 7.1/10 | 5.8/10 |
| Top Strength | Open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure | Automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity |
| Biggest Weakness | Clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience | End-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time |
| Best For | Appwrite is best for developers who want an open-source Firebase alternative with self-hosting capabilities. It particularly suits Flutter developers and teams that need data sovereignty or want to avoid vendor lock-in. | Convex is best for TypeScript developers building real-time applications who want automatic reactivity without managing WebSockets or cache invalidation. It excels for teams that value type safety and want a modern alternative to Firebase. |
| Winner | Convex (8.6/10) | |
What is Appwrite?
Open-source backend platform for web, mobile, and Flutter developersAppwrite is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform that provides developers with a set of easy-to-use APIs and tools to build modern applications. The platform offers a self-hosted option and a managed cloud service with databases (MariaDB-backed with document-style collections), authentication (50+ login methods including OAuth, magic links, phone, and anonymous), file storage with built-in image transformations, serverless functions (supporting Node.js, Python, PHP, Ruby, Dart, and more), real-time subscriptions via WebSocket, and messaging for push notifications, email, and SMS. Appwrite's database supports relationships, permissions, indexes, and full-text search. The platform provides SDKs for web, Flutter, Apple, Android, and server-side languages. Appwrite Cloud handles infrastructure management with automatic scaling, backups, and a generous free tier.
- +Open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure
- +Clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience
- +Generous free tier with 10 GB bandwidth and 750K function executions covers most side projects
- •Appwrite is best for developers who want an open-source Firebase alternative with self-hosting capabilities. It particularly suits Flutter developers and teams that need data sovereignty or want to avoid vendor lock-in.
What is Convex?
Reactive backend platform with real-time database, serverless functions, and automatic cachingConvex is a modern reactive backend-as-a-service platform that provides a real-time database, serverless functions, file storage, and scheduling in a single coherent platform. The database is fully ACID-compliant with automatic real-time sync to all connected clients, eliminating the need for manual WebSocket management or cache invalidation. Queries in Convex are reactive by default, meaning UI components automatically re-render when underlying data changes. Server functions are written in TypeScript and run in a V8 runtime with automatic retries on conflicts, ensuring serializable consistency. Convex supports scheduled functions (cron jobs and one-off), HTTP actions for webhooks and REST APIs, and file storage with automatic URL generation.
- +Automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity
- +End-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time
- +ACID transactions with automatic conflict retries ensure data consistency without manual handling
- •Convex is best for TypeScript developers building real-time applications who want automatic reactivity without managing WebSockets or cache invalidation. It excels for teams that value type safety and want a modern alternative to Firebase.
Appwrite vs Convex: Key Differences
Appwrite vs Convex: Quick Verdict
Decision Summary
Who wins in each scenario? A quick look at how Appwrite and Convex compare across different buyer needs.
Scores 8.6/10 vs 8.2/10
Scores 8.8/10 on value vs 8.2/10
Ease of use: 8.8/10 vs 8.5/10
Features + support avg: 8.5/10 vs 8.0/10
Free plan available + 8.8/10 value
Both offer free plans
Which One Should You Choose?
Based on features, pricing, and ratings — here's when each tool is the better pick.
Choose Appwrite If
- →Budget is your priority — Appwrite starts at $15/mo vs $25/mo
- →Value for money is a key factor — Appwrite delivers stronger ROI
Choose Convex If
- →You need enterprise-grade customer support (Convex: 8.5/10)
- →You need the most comprehensive feature set (Convex: 8.5/10)
Choose Appwrite if you need...
- ✓Open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure
- ✓Clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience
- ✓Generous free tier with 10 GB bandwidth and 750K function executions covers most side projects
- ✓Lower starting price ($15/mo vs $25/mo)
- !Open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure
- !Clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience
Choose Convex if you need...
- ✓Automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity
- ✓End-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time
- ✓ACID transactions with automatic conflict retries ensure data consistency without manual handling
- !Automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity
- !End-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time
Our Take: Appwrite vs Convex
Convex edges ahead with a 8.6/10 vs 8.2/10. The gap is noticeable but not dramatic — both are legitimate options depending on what you prioritize.
Where they differ: Appwrite's biggest strengths are open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure and clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience. Convex, on the other hand, shines with automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity and end-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time. These reflect fundamentally different product priorities.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each one with zero risk before committing. We recommend trying both for a week with real data.
Appwrite vs Convex Score Comparison
| Category | Appwrite | Convex |
|---|---|---|
🏆Overall Score | 8.2 | ▲8.6 |
💫Ease of Use | 8.5 | ▲8.8 |
⚙Features | 8.0 | ▲8.5 |
💰Value for Money | 8.8▲ | 8.2 |
💬Customer Support | 8.0 | ▲8.5 |
Why These Scores? Our Reasoning
- +Open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure
- +Clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience
- +Generous free tier with 10 GB bandwidth and 750K function executions covers most side projects
- -Open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure
- -Clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience
- +Automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity
- +End-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time
- +ACID transactions with automatic conflict retries ensure data consistency without manual handling
- -Automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity
- -End-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time
Appwrite vs Convex Pros & Cons
+Strengths
- ✓Open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure
- ✓Clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience
- ✓Generous free tier with 10 GB bandwidth and 750K function executions covers most side projects
-Weaknesses
- ✗Open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure
- ✗Clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience
- ✗Generous free tier with 10 GB bandwidth and 750K function executions covers most side projects
+Strengths
- ✓Automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity
- ✓End-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time
- ✓ACID transactions with automatic conflict retries ensure data consistency without manual handling
-Weaknesses
- ✗Automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity
- ✗End-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time
- ✗ACID transactions with automatic conflict retries ensure data consistency without manual handling
Who Should Use Appwrite vs Convex?
Appwrite is ideal for
- •Appwrite is best for developers who want an open-source Firebase alternative with self-hosting capabilities. It particularly suits Flutter developers and teams that need data sovereignty or want to avoid vendor lock-in.
Convex is ideal for
- •Convex is best for TypeScript developers building real-time applications who want automatic reactivity without managing WebSockets or cache invalidation. It excels for teams that value type safety and want a modern alternative to Firebase.
When NOT to Choose Appwrite or Convex
Knowing when a tool is the wrong fit is just as important as knowing its strengths
Skip Appwrite if...
- ✗Open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure
- ✗Clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience
- ✗Generous free tier with 10 GB bandwidth and 750K function executions covers most side projects
Skip Convex if...
- ✗Automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity
- ✗End-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time
- ✗ACID transactions with automatic conflict retries ensure data consistency without manual handling
Appwrite vs Convex Decision Framework
Choose based on what matters most to you
Appwrite vs Convex Pricing
| Pricing Feature | Appwrite | Convex |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Starting Price | $15/mo | $25/mo |
| Free Trial | Not available | Not available |
| Number of Plans | 3 | 3 |
| Value Rating | 8.8/10 | 8.2/10 |
Appwrite Plans
- ✓Unlimited projects
- ✓10 GB bandwidth
- ✓2 GB storage
- ✓750K function executions
- ✓300 GB bandwidth
- ✓150 GB storage
- ✓3.5M function executions
- ✓Email support
- ✓Unlimited bandwidth
- ✓Unlimited storage
- ✓Unlimited executions
- ✓Dedicated support
Convex Plans
- ✓1M function calls/month
- ✓1 GB database
- ✓1 GB file storage
- ✓Community support
- ✓Unlimited function calls
- ✓Up to 64 GB database
- ✓256 GB file storage
- ✓Priority support
- ✓Custom limits
- ✓Dedicated infrastructure
- ✓SLA guarantees
- ✓Dedicated support
What You Get: Plan Feature Comparison
Comparing Appwrite's Pro ($15/mo) vs Convex's Pro ($25/mo)
| Feature | Appwrite | Convex |
|---|---|---|
| 300 GB bandwidth | ✓ | ✗ |
| 150 GB storage | ✓ | ✗ |
| 3.5M function executions | ✓ | ✗ |
| Email support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Unlimited function calls | ✗ | ✓ |
| Up to 64 GB database | ✗ | ✓ |
| 256 GB file storage | ✗ | ✓ |
| Priority support | ✗ | ✓ |
Which Should You Choose?
Appwrite
Convex
Quick Buyer's Guide
Based on our analysis, here's who each tool is best suited for
- ✓Appwrite is best for developers who want an open-source Firebase alternative with self-hosting capabilities. It particularly suits Flutter developers and teams that need data sovereignty or want to avoid vendor lock-in.
- ✓Users who need open-source with self-hosting option gives full control over data and infrastructure
- ✓Users who need clean, intuitive dashboard and SDKs provide an excellent developer experience
- ✓Teams with tighter budgets ($15/mo vs $25/mo)
- ✓Convex is best for TypeScript developers building real-time applications who want automatic reactivity without managing WebSockets or cache invalidation. It excels for teams that value type safety and want a modern alternative to Firebase.
- ✓Users who need automatic real-time reactivity eliminates manual WebSocket and cache invalidation complexity
- ✓Users who need end-to-end type safety from database schema to React hooks catches errors at compile time
Appwrite vs Convex: The Bottom Line
Convex takes this matchup, though Appwrite remains a viable alternative.
Appwrite is the better choice for teams that want an open-source, self-hostable backend with traditional database patterns and full control over their infrastructure. Convex is ideal for developers building real-time, reactive applications who want automatic data syncing, TypeScript-first development, and a serverless experience without managing infrastructure. Appwrite at 8.2/10 is still competitive and may be the better fit depending on your specific requirements and budget.