We use provider pages as the source of truth.
Pricing, plan names, free plan availability, and trial details are checked against official provider pages before being used in ProPicked scores. Vendor relationships do not change rankings, scores, or recommendations.
Provider Pricing Facts
Provider pricing facts: AWS offers a free plan; Supabase offers a free plan.
Source and Freshness Note
Source and freshness note: pricing, free-plan, and feature signals are compared from public provider data and updated comparison records. Last checked May 2026.
AWS vs Supabase: Honest Comparison (2026)
AWS
The world's most comprehensive and widely adopted cloud platform
Supabase
Open-source Firebase alternative with Postgres database
We may earn a commission through links on this page · Editorial policy
Quick Verdict:
AWS wins with 9.2/10 vs 9.0/10. Choose AWS for more features. Choose Supabase for better value for money.
AWS wins this comparison with a score of 9.2/10 vs 9.0/10. Both offer free plans. AWS stands out for most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need, while Supabase excels at built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power. This is confirmed by our feature analysis where AWS also scores higher (9.5/10).
| Feature | AWS | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 9.2/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6.5/10 | 9.2/10 |
| Features | 9.8/10 | 8.7/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.0/10 | 9.2/10 |
| Customer Support | 8.5/10 | 9.2/10 |
| Free Plan | Yes ✓ | Yes ✓ |
| Starting Price | Custom | $25/mo |
| Feature Score | 9.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Top Strength | Most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need | Built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power |
| Biggest Weakness | Pricing is extremely complex and unpredictable — bills can spike without careful monitoring | Free tier database pauses after inactivity |
| Best For | - | Full-stack developers needing a backend quickly |
| Winner | AWS (9.2/10) | |
What is AWS?
The world's most comprehensive and widely adopted cloud platformAmazon Web Services (AWS) is the world's most comprehensive cloud computing platform, offering over 200 services including computing, storage, databases, machine learning, analytics, and IoT. AWS serves millions of customers from startups to enterprises and government agencies across 99 availability zones worldwide. Its pay-as-you-go pricing and massive service catalog make it the default choice for cloud infrastructure.
- +Most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need
- +Massive global infrastructure with the widest geographic coverage and lowest latency
- +Mature ecosystem with extensive documentation, certifications, and a vast community of experts
What is Supabase?
Open-source Firebase alternative with Postgres databaseSupabase is an open-source Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) built on PostgreSQL that provides database hosting, authentication, instant APIs, edge functions, real-time subscriptions, and file storage. It offers a Firebase-like developer experience with the power and reliability of PostgreSQL, supporting self-hosting and a generous free tier.
- +Built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power
- +Generous free tier for development and small projects
- +Open-source with self-hosting option
- •Full-stack developers needing a backend quickly
- •Startups building MVPs with limited backend resources
- •Teams wanting an open-source Firebase alternative
AWS vs Supabase: Key Differences
AWS vs Supabase: Quick Verdict
This one's basically a coin flip on paper — AWS scores 9.2/10 and Supabase hits 9/10. The right pick comes down to what you actually need day-to-day.
Choose AWS if:
- Most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need
- Massive global infrastructure with the widest geographic coverage and lowest latency
- Mature ecosystem with extensive documentation, certifications, and a vast community of experts
- You want the higher-rated option overall (9.2/10 vs 9/10)
Choose Supabase if:
- Built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power
- Generous free tier for development and small projects
- Open-source with self-hosting option
- You match the profile: full-stack developers needing a backend quickly
- Ease of use matters to you — Supabase scores 9.2/10 here
Decision Summary
Who wins in each scenario? A quick look at how AWS and Supabase compare across different buyer needs.
Scores 9.2/10 vs 9.0/10
Scores 9.2/10 on value vs 8.0/10
Ease of use: 9.2/10 vs 6.5/10
Features + support avg: 9.2/10 vs 8.9/10
Free plan available + 9.2/10 value
Both offer free plans
Which One Should You Choose?
Based on features, pricing, and ratings — here's when each tool is the better pick.
Choose AWS If
- →Budget is your priority — AWS starts at $0/mo vs $25/mo
- →You need the most comprehensive feature set (AWS: 9.8/10)
Choose Supabase If
- →Ease of use matters most — Supabase scores 9.2/10 vs 6.5/10
- →Value for money is a key factor — Supabase delivers stronger ROI
- →You need enterprise-grade customer support (Supabase: 9.2/10)
Choose AWS if you need...
- ✓Most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need
- ✓Massive global infrastructure with the widest geographic coverage and lowest latency
- ✓Mature ecosystem with extensive documentation, certifications, and a vast community of experts
- ✓Lower starting price ($0/mo vs $25/mo)
- !Pricing is extremely complex and unpredictable — bills can spike without careful monitoring
- !Steep learning curve with a console that can be overwhelming for newcomers
Choose Supabase if you need...
- ✓Built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power
- ✓Generous free tier for development and small projects
- ✓Open-source with self-hosting option
- !Free tier database pauses after inactivity
- !Edge functions ecosystem still maturing
Our Take: AWS vs Supabase
This is one of the closer matchups we've reviewed. AWS (9.2/10) and Supabase (9.0/10) are separated by just 0.2 points — practically a statistical tie. Your decision should come down to workflow fit, not scores.
Where they differ: AWS's biggest strengths are most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need and massive global infrastructure with the widest geographic coverage and lowest latency. Supabase, on the other hand, shines with built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power and generous free tier for development and small projects. These reflect fundamentally different product priorities.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each one with zero risk before committing. We recommend trying both for a week with real data.
AWS vs Supabase Score Comparison
| Category | AWS | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
🏆Overall Score | 9.2▲ | 9.0 |
💫Ease of Use | 6.5 | ▲9.2 |
⚙Features | 9.8▲ | 8.7 |
💰Value for Money | 8.0 | ▲9.2 |
💬Customer Support | 8.5 | ▲9.2 |
Why These Scores? Our Reasoning
AWS — 9.2/10- +Most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need
- +Massive global infrastructure with the widest geographic coverage and lowest latency
- +Mature ecosystem with extensive documentation, certifications, and a vast community of experts
- -Pricing is extremely complex and unpredictable — bills can spike without careful monitoring
- -Steep learning curve with a console that can be overwhelming for newcomers
- +Built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power
- +Generous free tier for development and small projects
- +Open-source with self-hosting option
- -Free tier database pauses after inactivity
- -Edge functions ecosystem still maturing
AWS vs Supabase Pros & Cons
AWS9.2/10+Strengths
- ✓Most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need
- ✓Massive global infrastructure with the widest geographic coverage and lowest latency
- ✓Mature ecosystem with extensive documentation, certifications, and a vast community of experts
-Weaknesses
- ✗Pricing is extremely complex and unpredictable — bills can spike without careful monitoring
- ✗Steep learning curve with a console that can be overwhelming for newcomers
- ✗Support is basic on free and developer plans — quality support requires expensive enterprise plans
+Strengths
- ✓Built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power
- ✓Generous free tier for development and small projects
- ✓Open-source with self-hosting option
- ✓Instant REST and GraphQL APIs from database schema
-Weaknesses
- ✗Free tier database pauses after inactivity
- ✗Edge functions ecosystem still maturing
- ✗Complex queries may need direct SQL knowledge
Who Should Use AWS vs Supabase?
Supabase is ideal for
- •Full-stack developers needing a backend quickly
- •Startups building MVPs with limited backend resources
- •Teams wanting an open-source Firebase alternative
When NOT to Choose AWS or Supabase
Knowing when a tool is the wrong fit is just as important as knowing its strengths
Skip AWS if...
- ✗Pricing is extremely complex and unpredictable — bills can spike without careful monitoring
- ✗Steep learning curve with a console that can be overwhelming for newcomers
- ✗Support is basic on free and developer plans — quality support requires expensive enterprise plans
- ✗You need something intuitive right away — ease of use scored 6.5/10
Skip Supabase if...
- ✗Free tier database pauses after inactivity
- ✗Edge functions ecosystem still maturing
- ✗Complex queries may need direct SQL knowledge
AWS vs Supabase Decision Framework
Choose based on what matters most to you
AWSAWSAWS vs Supabase Pricing
| Pricing Feature | AWS | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Starting Price | Free | $25/mo |
| Free Trial | Not available | Not available |
| Number of Plans | 4 | 4 |
| Value Rating | 8.0/10 | 9.2/10 |
AWS Plans
- ✓750 hrs EC2 t2.micro (12 months)
- ✓5GB S3 storage
- ✓25GB DynamoDB
- ✓1M Lambda requests/month
- +1 more
- ✓200+ services
- ✓Per-second billing
- ✓No upfront costs
- ✓Auto scaling
- +1 more
- ✓Up to 72% discount
- ✓1 or 3 year commitment
- ✓Flexible instance usage
- ✓Compute and EC2 plans
- ✓24/7 expert support
- ✓15-min response for critical
- ✓Technical Account Manager
- ✓Infrastructure Event Management
- +1 more
Supabase Plans
- ✓500MB database
- ✓50,000 monthly active users
- ✓1GB file storage
- ✓Community support
- ✓8GB database
- ✓100,000 monthly active users
- ✓100GB file storage
- ✓Daily backups
- ✓SOC2 compliance
- ✓Priority support
- ✓Standardized security questionnaire
- ✓28-day log retention
- ✓Custom database size
- ✓Dedicated support engineer
- ✓SLA guarantee
- ✓Custom contracts
What You Get: Plan Feature Comparison
Comparing AWS's Pay-as-you-go (Custom) vs Supabase's Pro ($25/mo)
| Feature | AWS | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| 200+ services | ✓ | ✗ |
| Per-second billing | ✓ | ✗ |
| No upfront costs | ✓ | ✗ |
| Auto scaling | ✓ | ✗ |
| Global infrastructure | ✓ | ✗ |
| 8GB database | ✗ | ✓ |
| 100,000 monthly active users | ✗ | ✓ |
| 100GB file storage | ✗ | ✓ |
| Daily backups | ✗ | ✓ |
Which Should You Choose?
Quick Buyer's Guide
Based on our analysis, here's who each tool is best suited for
AWS is best for:- ✓Users who need most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need
- ✓Users who need massive global infrastructure with the widest geographic coverage and lowest latency
- ✓Full-stack developers needing a backend quickly
- ✓Startups building MVPs with limited backend resources
- ✓Users who need built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power
AWS vs Supabase: The Bottom Line
AWS wins this comparison, but the right pick depends on your priorities.
## Our Verdict This one's basically a coin flip on paper — AWS scores 9.2/10 and Supabase hits 9/10. The right pick comes down to what you actually need day-to-day. ### Choose AWS if: - Most comprehensive cloud platform with 200+ services covering virtually any computing need - Massive global infrastructure with the widest geographic coverage and lowest latency - Mature ecosystem with extensive documentation, certifications, and a vast community of experts - You want the higher-rated option overall (9.2/10 vs 9/10) ### Choose Supabase if: - Built on PostgreSQL for reliability and SQL power - Generous free tier for development and small projects - Open-source with self-hosting option - You match the profile: full-stack developers needing a backend quickly - Ease of use matters to you — Supabase scores 9.2/10 here The gap is razor-thin — Supabase at 9.0/10 is a perfectly valid choice if its strengths align better with your needs.